Thoughts through the cycle: W3 December ’20

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Love in a cold climate – can you save in a zero-rate world?

  • The ‘bricks to clicks’ phenomenon which describes the shift in retail buying habits from high-street shopping to online purchasing is not new, but the restrictions imposed by the pandemic have accelerated the process. While headlines focus on the demise of Debenhams and the inexorable rise of Amazon, the lack of footfall on the high street, both as a cyclical and a structural issue, has much broader implications.
  • Given the decreed-from-on-high nature of lockdown and the arbitrary nature of restrictions and rules, it is only natural that government currently has a large hand to play in developments. For the high street, there has been a reprieve in the UK in the form of an extension on the commercial landlord eviction moratorium until the 31st December (‘UK extends ban on eviction of commercial tenants’, Financial Times, 09/12/2020).
  • The FT article suggests there is some confusion on owed rents and what is to be paid. The British Retail Consortium suggests that 80% of tenants have reached an agreement with their landlords on the status of money owed, while the trade body UKHospitality suggests only half of tenants have reached an agreement with landlords to defer or waive rents, with disagreement also on unpaid bills that have accrued this year. On the landlords’ side, the British Property Federation (BPF) is apparently happy that a firm date for the moratorium’s end has been established (don’t tell them about the Brexit deadlines..).
  • The amount of money owed is growing. UKHospitality estimates the figure to be £1.6bn by the end of 2020. With a harsh tiering system likely to continue into the new year and a growing realisation that the Covid-19 vaccines’ definition of ‘effective’ is somewhat wayward (apparently this does not mean people won’t die, nor that they won’t pass the virus on once vaccinated), then a return to normal feels like it is still someway off, at least until the warm weather reduces the virus’ potency.
  • In balance sheet terms, rent owed is a flow item. The stock aspect of the balance sheet is, if anything, more concerning. Not only has the high street taken a hit, but the WFH-phenomenon may yet prove to be a watershed in terms of work patterns with respect to offices and other professional working spaces. The two are linked – RWC’s own offices in Victoria, London, sit amidst a large new-build complex of shops, bars, restaurants and cafes. With fewer daily attendees in offices, the ecosystem of businesses surrounding could be permanently jeopardised. The value of commercial property will not escape a sharp lower revaluation.
  • Commercial property has become a key investment in terms of capital appreciation and income for a number of institutions, and any disturbance either to the flow or stock component of it will have consequences. There are of course the stories of absurd risk taking – the auditor KPMG has again in 2020 refused to sign off the accounts of Spelthorne Borough Council after it went on a £1.17bn commercial property spending spree financed by the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB). Local councils swinging the bat in the property market may ultimately be caused by funding cuts from central government, but it is nonetheless characteristic of a yield-searching mentality which is to be found in a low-rate world.
  • For much of the last 30-40 years, the classic 60/40 portfolio (60% equity and 40% bonds) has done a great job for pension funds and the like due to the negative correlation between the two asset classes. When equities roll over in a recession, central banks cut rates and bonds rally, partially offsetting the losses to equity. Cushty. Now there is a bit of a problem because rates are at zero and in some places negative, with little chance of any rate hikes any time soon (Chairman Jay Powell has gone on tape as saying the Fed ‘isn’t even thinking about thinking about hiking rates’). The graph below of the Barclays global aggregate of negative-yielding debt illustrates the problem well. The current total is now in excess of $18tn. Any new debt issued below zero guarantees a negative total return for the purchaser. Not ideal when your average pension fund has a target actuarial return of 7% per annum. The underfunding of pension funds and the overestimation of actuarial returns in the low-rate world will likely presage a social crisis far greater than the one of 2020. Money printing cannot fill this particular gap as these kinds of hand-outs would lead to instant inflation and would be largely self-defeating. What is to be done?

Source: Bloomberg, 14th December 2020.

  • If bonds yield nothing, can equities take up the slack? While some pension funds like Calpers in the US are advocating a gung-ho use of leverage to juice returns, many pension fund trustees are bound by (thankfully) strict rules on leverage with respect to fund allocation. In any case, US equities are very fully valued. The S&P 500 is trading on 26x forward earnings, a multiple rich even before one asks about earnings quality (Factset have found an average 32% differential between GAAP and non-GAAP earnings in recent US Q3 filings). The richness of the US equity market can easily be seen from the graph below which shows the classic Warren Buffett metric of total US equity market capitalisation as a percentage of GDP. It’s at an all-time high. Equities at 167% of US GDP is quite a thing.

Source: Bloomberg, 14th December 2020.

  • Won’t it all get easier when lockdowns end and the wall of pent-up demand hits the market? Bond yields should rise right? There are a few things to be said about this. First, the US yield curve is steepening (US 2yr vs 10yr curve steepness has gone from around 50 bps in March to just under 80 bps at the time of writing). This can be interpreted as a recovery but this is not always the case and curve steepening can lead to solvency issues in highly indebted economies. When one looks at the components of the US yield curve, the picture is not as rosy.
  • The graph below shows US 5y5y inflation (5yr inflation in 5yrs time, blue) rising, while US 10yr real rates (yellow) are still deeply negative and falling. Rising inflation and negative or falling real rates is the textbook definition of stagflation. The sharp rise in US jobless claims on 10th December (853k vs. 725k est and 712k prior) is the sort of data point which also suggests a weak recovery. The picture in the UK is similar with negative real rates and rising inflation. Japan and Europe have negative real rates but low inflation, hence negative nominal rates. We believe that the problem for pension funds is the negative real rates, as these mean that capital invested in bonds is being destroyed and purchasing power lost. Negative real yields mean low growth, so any equity rally in these circumstances is likely to be a multiple expansion, not ‘real’ earnings growth. This is exactly what is happening now.

Source: Bloomberg, 14th December 2020.

  • So equities are at record valuations, rates are low, and real yields are negative. How do you actually save at a time like this? An article in a recent edition of the Financial Times’ section has a stab at answering this thorny question (‘Zero interest rates: what the UK can learn from Japan’, FT Money, 05/12/2020). Japan was the first country to experience the negative rate phenomenon decades ago. Japan has since hosted an excellent Rugby World Cup in 2019 and Hello Kitty land is still up and running, so there must be some useful tips here about surviving the low-rate world.
  • It turns out that the initial answer was carry trades, where one shorts low yielding currencies (often on a leveraged basis) and buys higher yielding currencies. That led to the early 2000s heyday of the yen carry trade and “Mrs Watanabe”, the archetypal Japanese housewife-turned-currency-investor. Most high street banks in Japan began to offer foreign currency deposits, with displays in their windows showing interest rates in dollars, euros, Swiss francs, sterling and other currencies.
  • The mass-deleveraging event of the global financial crisis wiped out much of the accrued returns from carry trades as the yen soared. The wisdom of relying on a leverage strategy as a long-term means for saving is also questionable from a risk point of view. What is relevant for today’s saver though is that the Japanese story of the noughties could only work when it was just Japan doing it (don’t forget the massive commodity bull market and furious Chinese GDP growth that was going on simultaneously). With the whole world now at zero rates, there isn’t so much of a yield pick-up to be had. In fact, the proof of this is quantitative easing, one consequence of which is often currency weakening (when you do enough), and therefore an unofficial currency war has developed. This is not a happy hunting ground for stable carry trades.
  • The FT Money article[1] goes on to talk about property. Japan had a mega-bubble here, and the multi-decade deflation of this meant housing was not a good option for investors. The discussion above about commercial property in the UK is not the same by any means, but when one has a fully valued asset which is starting to roll over, one ought not to hold too much confidence in it being the mainstay of one’s portfolio. For residential property in the UK, Rightmove is bullish for 2021, predicting that asking prices will rise 4%, but then again, it’s Rightmove’s job to be bullish on houses.
  • Japan has a deflationary mindset, and that could be characterised as one of loss-avoidance and risk-aversion. A protracted period of deflation or low rates in the UK could lead to a similar psychology setting in. The Japanese save a lot, although some do punt the stock market. The FTSE in the UK is certainly trading at a lower multiple than the S&P 500 and therefore has some attractions on a relative basis. The FT concludes that, “taking a risk on stocks is less risky than not investing”, and that in a low-rate world, UK investors may well draw the same conclusion. Sounds like there is no alternative.
  • The problem with this is that a low-rate world is one with low growth (especially if real rates are negative), and low growth means low earnings growth for corporates as well. Punting equities is fine but is not without its risk, as rising stocks are an expression of multiple expansion not underlying earnings growth. The massive retail call-buying which has characterised 2020 is looking eerily like that of 1999, and with IPO’s like Airbnb and Doordash flying on launch, the speculative mania is there to be seen.
  • The 2000 crash also marked the start of a 10yr commodity super cycle. Off the radar for now, commodities may in fact be the opportunity that investors should be looking for, and one which allows them to ditch over-valued equities and yield-less bonds. The greening of the global economy as a government-sponsored exercise, along with radical money printing as a means to pay for it, may just be the catalyst the commodity market needs. Hard assets for hard times, and an answer to the zero-rate saving question.

[1] ‘Zero interest rates: what the UK can learn from Japan’, FT Money, 05/12/2020.

Unless otherwise stated, all opinions within this document are those of the RWC Diversified Return Investment Team, as at 14th December 2020.

The term “RWC” may include any one or more RWC branded entities including RWC Partners Limited and RWC Asset Management LLP, each of which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and, in the case of RWC Asset Management LLP, the US Securities and Exchange Commission; RWC Asset Advisors (US) LLC, which is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission; and RWC Singapore (Pte) Limited, which is licensed as a Licensed Fund Management Company by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

RWC may act as investment manager or adviser, or otherwise provide services, to more than one product pursuing a similar investment strategy or focus to the product detailed in this document. RWC seeks to minimise any conflicts of interest, and endeavours to act at all times in accordance with its legal and regulatory obligations as well as its own policies and codes of conduct.

This document is directed only at professional, institutional, wholesale or qualified investors. The services provided by RWC are available only to such persons. It is not intended for distribution to and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a retail or individual investor in any jurisdiction or for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and has not been delivered for registration in any jurisdiction nor has its content been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute: (i) a binding legal agreement; (ii) legal, regulatory, tax, accounting or other advice; (iii) an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell shares in any fund, security, commodity, financial instrument or derivative linked to, or otherwise included in a portfolio managed or advised by RWC; or (iv) an offer to enter into any other transaction whatsoever (each a “Transaction”). No representations and/or warranties are made that the information contained herein is either up to date and/or accurate and is not intended to be used or relied upon by any counterparty, investor or any other third party.

RWC uses information from third party vendors, such as statistical and other data, that it believes to be reliable. However, the accuracy of this data, which may be used to calculate results or otherwise compile data that finds its way over time into RWC research data stored on its systems, is not guaranteed. If such information is not accurate, some of the conclusions reached or statements made may be adversely affected. RWC bears no responsibility for your investment research and/or investment decisions and you should consult your own lawyer, accountant, tax adviser or other professional adviser before entering into any Transaction. Any opinion expressed herein, which may be subjective in nature, may not be shared by all directors, officers, employees, or representatives of RWC and may be subject to change without notice. RWC is not liable for any decisions made or actions or inactions taken by you or others based on the contents of this document and neither RWC nor any of its directors, officers, employees, or representatives (including affiliates) accepts any liability whatsoever for any errors and/or omissions or for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential loss, damages, or expenses of any kind howsoever arising from the use of, or reliance on, any information contained herein.

Information contained in this document should not be viewed as indicative of future results. Past performance of any Transaction is not indicative of future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up. Certain assumptions and forward looking statements may have been made either for modelling purposes, to simplify the presentation and/or calculation of any projections or estimates contained herein and RWC does not represent that that any such assumptions or statements will reflect actual future events or that all assumptions have been considered or stated. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and changing factors such as those affecting the markets generally, or those affecting particular industries or issuers, may cause results to differ from those discussed. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections will be realised or that actual returns or performance results will not materially differ from those estimated herein. Some of the information contained in this document may be aggregated data of Transactions executed by RWC that has been compiled so as not to identify the underlying Transactions of any particular customer.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it has been given and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. In accepting receipt of the information transmitted you agree that you and/or your affiliates, partners, directors, officers and employees, as applicable, will keep all information strictly confidential. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is prohibited. The information contained herein is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) to which this document has been provided. Any distribution or reproduction of this document is not authorised and is prohibited without the express written consent of RWC or any of its affiliates.

Changes in rates of exchange may cause the value of such investments to fluctuate. An investor may not be able to get back the amount invested and the loss on realisation may be very high and could result in a substantial or complete loss of the investment. In addition, an investor who realises their investment in a RWC-managed fund after a short period may not realise the amount originally invested as a result of charges made on the issue and/or redemption of such investment. The value of such interests for the purposes of purchases may differ from their value for the purpose of redemptions. No representations or warranties of any kind are intended or should be inferred with respect to the economic return from, or the tax consequences of, an investment in a RWC-managed fund. Current tax levels and reliefs may change. Depending on individual circumstances, this may affect investment returns. Nothing in this document constitutes advice on the merits of buying or selling a particular investment. This document expresses no views as to the suitability or appropriateness of the fund or any other investments described herein to the individual circumstances of any recipient.

AIFMD and Distribution in the European Economic Area (“EEA”)

The Alternative Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) (“AIFMD”) is a regulatory regime which came into full effect in the EEA on 22 July 2014. RWC Asset Management LLP is an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (an “AIFM”) to certain funds managed by it (each an “AIF”). The AIFM is required to make available to investors certain prescribed information prior to their investment in an AIF. The majority of the prescribed information is contained in the latest Offering Document of the AIF. The remainder of the prescribed information is contained in the relevant AIF’s annual report and accounts. All of the information is provided in accordance with the AIFMD.

In relation to each member state of the EEA (each a “Member State”), this document may only be distributed and shares in a RWC fund (“Shares”) may only be offered and placed to the extent that (a) the relevant RWC fund is permitted to be marketed to professional investors in accordance with the AIFMD (as implemented into the local law/regulation of the relevant Member State); or (b) this document may otherwise be lawfully distributed and the Shares may lawfully offered or placed in that Member State (including at the initiative of the investor).

Information Required for Distribution of Foreign Collective Investment Schemes to Qualified Investors in Switzerland

The representative and paying agent of the RWC-managed funds in Switzerland (the “Representative in Switzerland”) is Société Générale, Paris, Zurich Branch, Talacker 50,

P.O. Box 5070, CH-8021 Zurich. In respect of the units of the RWC-managed funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is at the registered office of the Representative in Switzerland.

Explore more


Please confirm your investor type



By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER

This website uses cookies. A cookie is a small data file placed on your computer which captures information about your choices which allows us to improve your experience of the website, for example, by remembering your country of residence. By continuing to access this website, you agree to be bound by our Cookie Policy. You can accept and/or block at any time by changing your browser settings.


Where are you located?



Rest of world

By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER


What type of investor are you?



By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER