Thoughts through the cycle: W2 October ’20

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
  • The new letter-du-jour for describing the current economic situation is K-shaped. This seems to mean some people (generally those who were already rich) are doing well, and those in lower socio-economic groups are struggling and will likely to continue to struggle if the global economy stabilises at a lower level. Central banks are generally pretty happy with their performance so far (quantitative easing increased, bond yields controlled, asset prices at highs, no currency crises yet), although one wonders whether there is a little bit in all of this of George Bush Jnr standing on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln back in May 2003 famously proclaiming mission accomplished in Iraq just as the insurgency was getting into full swing.
  • One of the reasons the recovery (or recession?) is K-shaped is the radical policy action from central banks and governments, not least the lockdown and subsequent restrictions and rule-making that has ensued. In the UK, the memory of governments in the 1970s trying to ‘pick winners’ in the industrial sector is still strong, with the disaster that was British Leyland looming large. Because the pandemic has greatly increased government activism, there is a bit of a sense of a re-run on the ’70s, although this time the government appears to be avoiding losers rather than picking winners, and those who win are only doing so by accident.
  • So when one week bicycle-retailer Halfords (HFD.LN) saw its stock price rise 28% to 237p as it announced higher-than-expected summer sales in its cycling and car-repair business due to changes in the public’s transport preferences, the next week, Cineworld (CINE.LN) stock falls 30% to 27.5p as it announces the closure of its UK operations with the loss of 5,500 jobs due to falling demand and delays to the release of blockbusters like the new Bond film. The fates of companies are being decided seemingly at random when in fact this is all the product of government policy.
  • The final version of the UK’s main Q2 macroeconomic data was released on 30th Q2 GDP fell a staggering 19.8% (although this was better than the initial estimate of 20.4%), taking the economy back to 2000 levels. Private consumption fell 23.6% quarter-on-quarter, while business investment fell a terrifying 26.5% quarter-on-quarter. There is no benefit to putting lipstick on this particular pig. The only solace is that after a collapse of this magnitude, the numbers in Q3 will bounce sharply. The question is not whether there will be a bounce, but at what level the economy stabilises versus its pre-Covid level.
  • One area where the bounce can already be seen is in housing. The Bank of England has cut rates making mortgages more affordable while the Treasury has temporarily removed stamp tax from the first £500,000 of any housing purchase as a further incentive. If one takes these measures together with pent-up demand from transactions delayed by the lockdown as well newly planned acquisitions resulting from those who have decided to relocate as a result of the experience of lockdown itself, then the graph below showing the Nationwide house-price index rising at a 5% year-on-year clip in September are not all that surprising. Funny old recession eh?

Source: Bloomberg as at 5 October 2020.

  • With house prices so buoyant, one would have thought the UK bank stocks would be having a right old time. Sadly, that is not the case. The graph below shows Lloyds Bank (LLOY.LN) languishing at a price well below half that which it traded on the day Boris Johnson won the election back in December 2019. Equities are forward-looking instruments. If the dividend were resumed at say 1.5p, the stock would yield around 5.5% with 10yr gilts at 0.25%. The stock trades on around half 2019 tangible book, and a fully-loaded core tier 1 ratio of 13.4% (vs management target of 12.5%). Mortgage lending is clearly recovering vs H1 2020, even if management estimates that commercial lending is still not recovering from the 10% fall seen in H1. Not that bad a bet?

Source: Bloomberg as at 5 October 2020.

  • One way of explaining the lack of positive price momentum for a stock like LLOY is Brexit uncertainty. This may be the case, but equally one could say that the pound trading around $1.30 against the dollar is doing an awful lot better than it was at the distressed levels of $1.15 seen back in March, even if part of that differential is really dollar weakness rather the sterling strength.
  • Another reason could be that the UK yield curve is lower than it was in 2019. The graph below shows the current UK gilt curve in green with the same curve as of election day (12/12/2020) in yellow (dotted). Not only have rates been cut, but the UK gilt curve is now negative out to seven years. The Bank of England (BoE) is currently flapping around the issue of negative rates like a mother hen around a particularly prized egg. The Fed is vociferous about the detrimental effect of negative rates on the banking sector. The ECB is far more sanguine, in part because negative rates are already a fact in the Eurozone and to decry them would lead to a banking crisis. The BoE will likely be forced to go negative as the market has already done so, although Brexit will likely provide a convenient bit of cover for the policy change.

Source: Bloomberg as at 5 October 2020.

  • Cancelled dividends, negative rates, Brexit uncertainty and the recession all play their part in the drouthy performance of UK bank equities. Minus Brexit, banks stocks in Europe and the US are struggling too. But there may be another issue, one which has only existed as a result of the pandemic and the government’s response to it, and which will change the dynamic not only of the banking sector, but potentially other areas of the economy.
  • As a response to the lockdown, the UK Treasury initiated the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) to help companies survive the shock of quarantine. Around £58b was lent, and it is estimated that as much as a third of loans were potentially bad at the time of being written. These are clearly loans no bank would ever have made – only a government would make a loan like that (i.e. handing out tax payers’ money). The tenor of the loans was extended from six years to ten years in September, so already we are seeing evergreening or ‘extend and pretend’.
  • More recently, the Sunday Times has reported that Boris Johnson is now looking for a policy allowing for long-term fixed-rate mortgages with just a 5% deposit. Such products are now few and far between in the market (most mortgages have a loan-to-value of 85% or lower), and in any case, long-term fixed-rate products are a feature of the US market not the UK one (PM sparks alarm with plan for 95% home loans, Sunday Times, 04/10/2020). When George Osborne was Chancellor and introduced the help-to-buy policy, the government guarantee to lenders was supposed to cover the first 15%. The article hints that a lot more of the risk would have to be shouldered by the taxpayer for these new loans, especially as there would likely be a relaxing of lending standards in terms of checks on the borrower.
  • While the article focuses on how help-to-buy policies actually increase house prices rather than making housing more affordable, and while building firms may be salivating over the prospect of another gravy train of government-induced building (remember the outcry at the boss of building firm Persimmon Jeff Fairburn initially being awarded a £100m bonus in 2018?), there is something far more important going on here.
  • In the name of a general, economic recovery after the pandemic but also of prior commitments to ‘levelling up’ as part of its election mandate, the British government seems increasingly willing to step into the lending market and underwrite or guarantee credit which banks otherwise would not make on their own. This transforms the banking sector into the conduit of government policy. Key to the execution of policy is low rates, and the close coordination of BoE quantitative easing with government deficit spending is another key pillar of this populist policy approach.
  • While monetisation of the deficit by the central bank is still only a de facto practice and one about which BoE governor Andrew Bailey was concerned enough back in April 2020 to go on record in the Financial Times to decry, reality is that BoE QE is already mirroring the government’s deficit spending. If the BoE were to get cold feet, the Treasury already has policy options (the Ways and Means fund) which allow it to bypass the bond market and have the BoE fund the deficit directly.
  • UK CPI inflation was 0.2% year-on-year in September, and will likely stay low or possibly even head negative in the next few months. What investors should however be aware of is the likely consequence of the fusion of fiscal and monetary policy as a result of the pandemic for a government which was already populist in its pretensions, especially when the point of departure is zero rates and therefore apparently no cost to borrowing, and even if there were a cost, the central will bank would step-in to cap it. While there appears to be no consequence to all of this now, this is a genuine change in government practice and can only eventually lead to inflation. At some point people will not be looking at the value of house prices, but the value of the money that the price of houses is denominated in.

Past performance is not a guide to the future. The price of investments and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the full amount invested. The names shown above are for illustrated purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or advice.

Unless otherwise stated, all opinions within this document are those of the RWC Diversified Return Investment Team, as at 5 October 2020.

The term “RWC” may include any one or more RWC branded entities including RWC Partners Limited and RWC Asset Management LLP, each of which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and, in the case of RWC Asset Management LLP, the US Securities and Exchange Commission; RWC Asset Advisors (US) LLC, which is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission; and RWC Singapore (Pte) Limited, which is licensed as a Licensed Fund Management Company by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

RWC may act as investment manager or adviser, or otherwise provide services, to more than one product pursuing a similar investment strategy or focus to the product detailed in this document. RWC seeks to minimise any conflicts of interest, and endeavours to act at all times in accordance with its legal and regulatory obligations as well as its own policies and codes of conduct.

This document is directed only at professional, institutional, wholesale or qualified investors. The services provided by RWC are available only to such persons. It is not intended for distribution to and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a retail or individual investor in any jurisdiction or for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and has not been delivered for registration in any jurisdiction nor has its content been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute: (i) a binding legal agreement; (ii) legal, regulatory, tax, accounting or other advice; (iii) an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell shares in any fund, security, commodity, financial instrument or derivative linked to, or otherwise included in a portfolio managed or advised by RWC; or (iv) an offer to enter into any other transaction whatsoever (each a “Transaction”). No representations and/or warranties are made that the information contained herein is either up to date and/or accurate and is not intended to be used or relied upon by any counterparty, investor or any other third party.

RWC uses information from third party vendors, such as statistical and other data, that it believes to be reliable. However, the accuracy of this data, which may be used to calculate results or otherwise compile data that finds its way over time into RWC research data stored on its systems, is not guaranteed. If such information is not accurate, some of the conclusions reached or statements made may be adversely affected. RWC bears no responsibility for your investment research and/or investment decisions and you should consult your own lawyer, accountant, tax adviser or other professional adviser before entering into any Transaction. Any opinion expressed herein, which may be subjective in nature, may not be shared by all directors, officers, employees, or representatives of RWC and may be subject to change without notice. RWC is not liable for any decisions made or actions or inactions taken by you or others based on the contents of this document and neither RWC nor any of its directors, officers, employees, or representatives (including affiliates) accepts any liability whatsoever for any errors and/or omissions or for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential loss, damages, or expenses of any kind howsoever arising from the use of, or reliance on, any information contained herein.

Information contained in this document should not be viewed as indicative of future results. Past performance of any Transaction is not indicative of future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up. Certain assumptions and forward looking statements may have been made either for modelling purposes, to simplify the presentation and/or calculation of any projections or estimates contained herein and RWC does not represent that that any such assumptions or statements will reflect actual future events or that all assumptions have been considered or stated. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and changing factors such as those affecting the markets generally, or those affecting particular industries or issuers, may cause results to differ from those discussed. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections will be realised or that actual returns or performance results will not materially differ from those estimated herein. Some of the information contained in this document may be aggregated data of Transactions executed by RWC that has been compiled so as not to identify the underlying Transactions of any particular customer.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it has been given and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. In accepting receipt of the information transmitted you agree that you and/or your affiliates, partners, directors, officers and employees, as applicable, will keep all information strictly confidential. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is prohibited. The information contained herein is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) to which this document has been provided. Any distribution or reproduction of this document is not authorised and is prohibited without the express written consent of RWC or any of its affiliates.

Changes in rates of exchange may cause the value of such investments to fluctuate. An investor may not be able to get back the amount invested and the loss on realisation may be very high and could result in a substantial or complete loss of the investment. In addition, an investor who realises their investment in a RWC-managed fund after a short period may not realise the amount originally invested as a result of charges made on the issue and/or redemption of such investment. The value of such interests for the purposes of purchases may differ from their value for the purpose of redemptions. No representations or warranties of any kind are intended or should be inferred with respect to the economic return from, or the tax consequences of, an investment in a RWC-managed fund. Current tax levels and reliefs may change. Depending on individual circumstances, this may affect investment returns. Nothing in this document constitutes advice on the merits of buying or selling a particular investment. This document expresses no views as to the suitability or appropriateness of the fund or any other investments described herein to the individual circumstances of any recipient.

AIFMD and Distribution in the European Economic Area (“EEA”)

The Alternative Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) (“AIFMD”) is a regulatory regime which came into full effect in the EEA on 22 July 2014. RWC Asset Management LLP is an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (an “AIFM”) to certain funds managed by it (each an “AIF”). The AIFM is required to make available to investors certain prescribed information prior to their investment in an AIF. The majority of the prescribed information is contained in the latest Offering Document of the AIF. The remainder of the prescribed information is contained in the relevant AIF’s annual report and accounts. All of the information is provided in accordance with the AIFMD.

In relation to each member state of the EEA (each a “Member State”), this document may only be distributed and shares in a RWC fund (“Shares”) may only be offered and placed to the extent that (a) the relevant RWC fund is permitted to be marketed to professional investors in accordance with the AIFMD (as implemented into the local law/regulation of the relevant Member State); or (b) this document may otherwise be lawfully distributed and the Shares may lawfully offered or placed in that Member State (including at the initiative of the investor).

Information Required for Distribution of Foreign Collective Investment Schemes to Qualified Investors in Switzerland

The representative and paying agent of the RWC-managed funds in Switzerland (the “Representative in Switzerland”) is Société Générale, Paris, Zurich Branch, Talacker 50,

P.O. Box 5070, CH-8021 Zurich. In respect of the units of the RWC-managed funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is at the registered office of the Representative in Switzerland.

Explore more

INVESTOR TYPE SELECTOR

Please confirm your investor type

Professional

Non-professional

By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER

This website uses cookies. A cookie is a small data file placed on your computer which captures information about your choices which allows us to improve your experience of the website, for example, by remembering your country of residence. By continuing to access this website, you agree to be bound by our Cookie Policy. You can accept and/or block at any time by changing your browser settings.

SELECT YOUR REGION

Where are you located?

Europe

Asia-Pacific

Rest of world

By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER

INVESTOR TYPE SELECTOR

What type of investor are you?

Professional

Non-professional

By clicking Submit, you agree that you have read and accepted the terms and conditions detailed in the DISCLAIMER